ED Design Comparison — Operational Digital Twin

Decision Laboratory

Two Emergency Room floor plans · one patient stream · Center for Supply Chain Studies
Shift clock
00:00
Both designs receive the identical patients — same arrival times, acuities, and treatment durations. Same footprint, same resources: 16 treatment spaces, 2 triage, 3 physicians. Only the architecture differs.
Design A — Conventional
Single waiting room · one shared bay corridor · pooled physicians
16 bays · 2 triage · 3 physicians (pooled)
Door-to-doc (med)
—
Length of stay
—
Patients seen
—
Walked out (LWBS)
—
Waiting now
—
Space utilization
—
Design B — Split-flow
Fast-track zone for minor cases · two acute pods · dedicated fast-track physician
12 acute bays + 4 fast-track · 2 triage · 3 physicians (1 fast-track)
Door-to-doc (med)
—
Length of stay
—
Patients seen
—
Walked out (LWBS)
—
Waiting now
—
Space utilization
—

Head-to-head

ESI 1 — resuscitation ESI 2 — emergent ESI 3 — urgent ESI 4 — less urgent ESI 5 — non-urgent

Waiting census across the shift

Design A — Conventional Design B — Split-flow
Demonstration miniature. Production twins run on AnyLogic with the facility's actual Revit geometry and historical arrival data, surfacing results through Power BI. Center for Supply Chain Studies · Decision Laboratory
0